Figure: Foreshorterning

The drawing has been planned well on the paper as the image fits with the angle that the skeleton was positioned. The foreshortening in the image is ok because of the faint blocks used to construct the bones however the back of the cranium does not look right because it looks like the jaw is sticking too far.The proportion on the Ribs looks off because it feels like it is not connected to the pelvis and it is pushed out. The form of the bones looks ok as the eye is able to see the curves that are on the skeleton however some bones like the Fibula could be more visible in the image.If some impressionistic techniques were used the on the skeleton the complexity of the ribs could look like it is connected to the Sternum without making that part of the image look a mess which would distract the eye from the rest of the drawing.

The overall proportion & relative scale of the body to the cranium is ok as ribs are vertically in proportion and is horizontally in proportion. The pelvis and the legs are all measured to the scale of the cranium  the same goes to for the arm. There could be a better sense of depth on the ribs just so that it does not look like there is a lot of lines and give the impression that there are bones. There could also be a better sense of depth on the Ulna, Radius, Tibia and Fibula as these bones are close together the on the legs and the arms and in the drawing they merge almost so they could have a little bit more space between  them and they could also have some shading to show that they are separate from each other.